4.7 Article

Metal-to-ligand ratio-controlled assembly of two Ca(II) complexes: Synthesis, structures, reactant-induced reversible transformation, and catalytic properties

期刊

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY COMMUNICATIONS
卷 145, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.inoche.2022.109906

关键词

Calcium(II) complexes; Topiroxostat; Metal-to-ligand ratio-controlled assembly; Reversible transformation; Ring-opening polymerization

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. Jiangsu Province Prospective Industry -University -Research Cooperative Research Program of China
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Ed- ucation Institutions (PAPD)
  4. [21676030]
  5. [11775037]
  6. [BY2016029-08]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two new complexes with different structures and thermal stabilities were successfully synthesized through hydrothermal reactions, and they showed reversible structural transformation properties. The ligand in the complexes was also formed in situ through hydrolysis reaction. The catalytic performance of the complexes in the solvent-free ring-opening polymerization of epsilon-caprolactone was significant.
Hydrothermal reactions of Ca(NO3)2 center dot 4H2O and topiroxostat with different metal-to-ligand ratios yielded two new complexes {[Ca2(L)2(H2O)6]center dot H2O}n (1) and Ca(HL)2(H2O)4 (2) [H2L = 4-(3-(pyridine-4-yl)-1H-1,2,4-triazol-5-yl)picolinic acid], involving ligand in situ formation by hydrolysis of topiroxostat. X-ray structural analysis revealed that complex 1 has a 1D coordination polymeric structure while complex 2 displays a 0D discrete molecule. Both complexes exhibit interesting reactant-induced reversible structural transformation properties. Thermogravimetric analysis and temperature-dependent PXRD patterns indicated that the network of 1 keep high thermal stability up to 400 degrees C. The catalytic performance of the complexes for the solvent-free ring-opening polymerization of epsilon-caprolactone has been investigated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据