4.7 Article

Csp2-H Amination Reactions Mediated by Metastable Pseudo-Oh Masked Aryl-CoIII-nitrene Species

期刊

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c02111

关键词

-

资金

  1. MICINN [CTQ2016- 77989-P, PID2019-104498GB-I00, PGC2018- 098212-B-C22, PGC2018-095808-B-I00]
  2. Generalitat de Catalunya [2017SGR264, 2017SGR39]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cobalt-catalyzed C-H amination is a research topic of great interest. Through experimental and computational studies, we have successfully unraveled the mechanism and identified the essential role of carboxylate ligands in stabilizing and guiding the reaction towards C-sp2-N bond formation.
Cobalt-catalyzed C-H amination via M-nitrenoid species is spiking the interest of the research community. Understanding this process at a molecular level is a challenging task, and here we report a well-defined macrocydic system featuring a pseudo-O-h aryl-Co-III species that reacts with aliphatic azides to effect intramolecular C-sp2-N bond formation. Strikingly, a putative aryl-Co=NR nitrenoid intermediate species is formed and is rapidly trapped by a carboxylate ligand to form a carboxylate masked-nitrene, which functions as a shortcut to stabilize and guide the reaction to productive intramolecular C-sp2-N bond formation. On one hand, several intermediate species featuring the C-sp2-N bond formed have been isolated and structurally characterized, and the essential role of the carboxylate ligand has been proven. Complementarily, a thorough density functional theory study of the C-sp2-N bond formation mechanism explains at the molecular level the key role of the carboxylate-masked nitrene species, which is essential to tame the metastability of the putative aryl-Co-III=NR nitrene species to effectively yield the C-sp2-N products. The solid molecular mechanistic scheme determined for the C-sp2-N bond forming reaction is fully supported by both experimental and computation complementary studies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据