4.6 Article

Theoretical and practical applications of blockchain in healthcare information management

期刊

INFORMATION & MANAGEMENT
卷 59, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2022.103649

关键词

Blockchain; Health Management Information Systems; Security Perception; Motivation; Social Exchange Theory

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to investigate how blockchain technology can improve the sharing of health records. Due to existing security and privacy issues, medical histories are not always accessible. The research proposes a blockchain-based model, which was found to provide a secure information system and increase patient motivation to share medical records.
A primary objective of blockchain technology is to address information security and efficiency issues related to existing information sharing systems. For the sharing of health records, little is known about the application of blockchain in management information systems. There are strict regulations for sharing health information due to insecure systems and privacy concerns. To significantly and effectively improve medical diagnosis, it is beneficial to have efficient, reliable, and accurate accessibility to a patient's full medical history. Due to concerns with the security of health systems and privacy concerns, medical histories are not always accessible to healthcare providers. To help increase accessibility options, this research proposes a blockchain-based model that facilitates sharing medical records in a manner that is beneficial to both healthcare providers and patients. Social exchange theory provides the theoretical support for the conceptual model presented. Experimental findings based on 151 participants revealed that the blockchain technology can provide a secure information system and increase patient motivation to share medical records. To show the applicability of the proposed use of blockchain from a practical managerial perspective, we show feasibility by developing an Android software application.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据