4.5 Article

Searching for a Consensus Among Inflammatory Bowel Disease Studies: A Systematic Meta-Analysis

期刊

INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASES
卷 29, 期 1, 页码 125-139

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/ibd/izac194

关键词

IBD; UC; CD; meta-analysis; alpha diversity; beta diversity; microbiome; sequencing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis of 13 inflammatory bowel disease studies to evaluate the reproducibility. The results showed that the heterogeneity was greater in Crohn's disease studies compared to ulcerative colitis studies, and sample type variation played a significant role in the inconsistency.
Lay Summary To assess reproducibility in inflammatory bowel disease microbiome research, we performed a meta-analysis of 13 inflammatory bowel disease studies, measuring effects of disease and sample type. Crohn's disease studies were more heterogeneous than ulcerative colitis studies, and sample type variation was a major contributor to inconsistency. Background Numerous studies have examined the gut microbial ecology of patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis, but inflammatory bowel disease-associated taxa and ecological effect sizes are not consistent between studies. Methods We systematically searched PubMed and Google Scholar and performed a meta-analysis of 13 studies to analyze how variables such as sample type (stool, biopsy, and lavage) affect results in inflammatory bowel disease gut microbiome studies, using uniform bioinformatic methods for all primary data. Results Reduced alpha diversity was a consistent feature of both CD and ulcerative colitis but was more pronounced in CD. Disease contributed significantly variation in beta diversity in most studies, but effect size varied, and the effect of sample type was greater than the effect of disease. Fusobacterium was the genus most consistently associated with CD, but disease-associated genera were mostly inconsistent between studies. Stool studies had lower heterogeneity than biopsy studies, especially for CD. Conclusions Our results indicate that sample type variation is an important contributor to study variability that should be carefully considered during study design, and stool is likely superior to biopsy for CD studies due to its lower heterogeneity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据