4.6 Article

Toward Heat-Resistant and Transparent Poly(L-lactide) by Tailoring Crystallization with an Aliphatic Amide as a Nucleating Agent

期刊

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
卷 61, 期 37, 页码 13921-13928

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.2c02811

关键词

-

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Sichuan province [2022NSFSC0348]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51873129]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By utilizing EBH as a nucleating agent, the crystallization of PLLA was successfully controlled, leading to the fabrication of highly crystallized and heat-resistant, transparent PLLA materials.
Poly(L-lactide) (PLLA) has been known as an important bioplastic with tremendous potential to replace some conventional fossil-based plastics; however, its commercial application still faces great challenges in terms of the implacable contradiction between high thermomechanical properties and exceptional optical transparency. Herein, we report a feasible and promising strategy to address this challenge by utilizing N,N- ethylenebis(12-hydroxystearamide) (EBH) as an efficient nucleating agent (NA) to tailor the crystallization of PLLA. The results show that the presence of EBH can not only accelerate the melt crystallization of PLLA but also remarkably decrease the size of the crystals formed in the crystallization at low temperatures of 80-90 ?. Further analysis indicates that the EBH molecules dispersed in PLLA melt could self-organize into nanofibrous network structures upon cooling, which can provide an extremely large nucleation surface for the growth of numerous nanosized crystals. Consequently, highly crystallized (the crystallinity is as high as 45%) PLLA sheets with an impressive combination of superb heat resistance and good transparency (the clarity is ca. 70%) have been successfully fabricated by melt processing with the aid of 0.4-0.8 wt % EBH. Our work offers a new opportunity to develop heat-resistant and transparent PLLA materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据