4.3 Editorial Material

Effective or predatory funding? Evaluating the hidden costs of grant applications

相关参考文献

注意:仅列出部分参考文献,下载原文获取全部文献信息。
Letter Psychology, Biological

Why many funding schemes harm rather than support research

Martin Dresler et al.

NATURE HUMAN BEHAVIOUR (2022)

Editorial Material Neurosciences

FENS-Kavli Network of Excellence: Postponed, non-competitive peer review for research funding

Martin Dresler

Summary: Receiving research grants is a highlight of academic career, but the process of acquiring funding is often disliked by many researchers. The current research funding system is inefficient and needs improvement. A simple, fair and widely supported alternative is to distribute funding more equally among researchers and implement quality control through postponed peer review using open science practices.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE (2022)

Review Behavioral Sciences

Review The Psychology of (In)Effective Altruism

Lucius Caviola et al.

Summary: Many charitable donors prioritize emotional appeal over effectiveness, influenced by personal preferences and cognitive biases. Research on strategies to promote effective giving is crucial for increasing societal benefit.

TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES (2021)

Article Cultural Studies

Metrics of Inequality: The Concentration of Resources in the US Biomedical Elite

Yarden Katz et al.

SCIENCE AS CULTURE (2020)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Predatory journals: no definition, no defence

Agnes Grudniewicz et al.

NATURE (2019)

Article Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

Contest models highlight inherent inefficiencies of scientific funding competitions

Kevin Gross et al.

PLOS BIOLOGY (2019)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Low agreement among reviewers evaluating the same NIH grant applications

Elizabeth L. Pier et al.

PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2018)

Review Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications

Studying grant decision-making: a linguistic analysis of review reports

Peter van den Besselaar et al.

SCIENTOMETRICS (2018)

Article Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications

Funding, evaluation, and the performance of national research systems

Ulf Sandstrom et al.

JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS (2018)

Article Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications

An efficient system to fund science: from proposal review to peer-to-peer distributions

Johan Bollen et al.

SCIENTOMETRICS (2017)

Editorial Material Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

From funding agencies to scientific agency

Johan Bollen et al.

EMBO REPORTS (2014)

Article Medicine, General & Internal

On the time spent preparing grant proposals: an observational study of Australian researchers

Danielle L. Herbert et al.

BMJ OPEN (2013)

Review Medicine, General & Internal

Funding grant proposals for scientific research: retrospective analysis of scores by members of grant review panel

Nicholas Graves et al.

BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2011)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Sample Size and Precision in NIH Peer Review

David Kaplan et al.

PLOS ONE (2008)