4.4 Article

A Fast and Robust Semi-Analytical Approach for the Calculation of Coil Transient Eddy-Current Response Above Planar Specimens

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS
卷 58, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMAG.2022.3183019

关键词

Time-frequency analysis; Magnetostatics; Mathematical models; Transient analysis; Permeability; Harmonic analysis; Time-domain analysis; Eddy current testing; modal analysis; nondestructive testing; spectral-domain

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the transient response of an induction coil above an infinite conducting plate is calculated using a combination of semi-analytical modal expansion approach and Euler integration scheme in the time domain. The derived state equation is equivalent to the Helmholtz equation with an imaginary frequency linked to the sampling rate, providing computational advantages compared to spectral methods. The time stepping schemes are found to be more robust than spectral approaches.
The transient response of an induction coil above an infinite conducting plate is calculated in the time domain (TD) by combining a semi-analytical modal expansion approach with the Euler integration scheme. The derived state equation at a given time step is formally equivalent to the Helmholtz equation with an imaginary frequency linked to the sampling rate, which provides a significant computational advantage with respect to spectral methods based on Fourier/Laplace domain discretization. In addition, time stepping schemes prove to be more robust than the spectral approaches, where the optimal choice of the sample frequencies is an issue of major concern. The developed solution is applied for the calculation of the magnetic field in a driver-pickup coil inspection configuration involving pulsed currents, and the coil response is obtained using the TD version of the reciprocity theorem. The theoretical results are compared against reference numerical solutions demonstrating an excellent agreement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据