4.8 Article

Towards Prediction Constraints: A Novel Domain Adaptation Method for Machine Fault Diagnosis

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS
卷 18, 期 10, 页码 7198-7207

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TII.2021.3133938

关键词

Fault diagnosis; Measurement; Machinery; Feature extraction; Task analysis; Informatics; Deep learning; Deep learning; domain adaptation; intelligent fault diagnosis; machine; prediction constraints

资金

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2021T140038]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91860205]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article introduces a domain adaptation method for intelligent fault diagnosis of machinery, which uses minimum class confusion and maximum nuclear norm-based constraints to improve accurate diagnosis results.
Domain adaptation technologies have been extensively explored and successfully applied to machine fault diagnosis, aiming to address problems that target data are unlabeled and have a certain distribution bias with source data. Nonetheless, existing fault diagnosis methods mainly explore feature-level alignment strategies to reduce domain discrepancies, which not only fails to directly ascertain the relationship between the target output and domain deviation, but also cannot guarantee accurate diagnosis results (i.e., learning class-discriminative features) when only relying on feature adaptation. In light of these issues, a more intuitive and effective domain adaptation method is developed for intelligent diagnosis of machinery in this article, in which the minimum class confusion and maximum nuclear norm-based target prediction constraints are simultaneously designed to promote learning reliable domain-invariant and discriminative features for accurate fault diagnosis. We conduct extensive experiments based on two different mechanical systems to evaluate the proposed method. Comprehensive results and discussions demonstrate the promising performance of our approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据