4.6 Article

Study of β-Ga2O3-Based Thin-Channel MODFET Devices Using a Coupled Drift-Diffusion/Multisubband BTE Solver

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES
卷 69, 期 9, 页码 4870-4876

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TED.2022.3188613

关键词

Boltzmann transport equation (BTE); gallium oxide (Ga2O3); modulation-doped FET (MODFET)

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korean Government [NRF2019R1A2C1086656, NRF-2020M3H4A3081800]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2020M3H4A3081800] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The theoretical investigation focuses on gallium-oxide-based modulation-doped field-effect transistors (MODFETs). A coupled drift-diffusion/multisubband Boltzmann transport equation solver is implemented to accurately consider the electrical characteristics of the two-dimensional electron gases (2DEGs) in thin-channel devices. The impact of various factors on the cutoff frequency is rigorously calculated, and it is found that a cutoff frequency of about 90 GHz can be achieved under certain conditions.
Gallium-oxide-based modulation-doped field-effect transistors (MODFETs) are theoretically investigated. In order to properly consider the electrical characteristics of the two-dimensional electron gases (2DEGs) in thin-channel devices, a coupled drift-diffusion (DD)/multisubband Boltzmann transport equation (MS-BTE) solver is implemented. Parameters adopted in the simulation are determined by referring to the experimental results of existing long-channel devices. The impact of the channel length, the channel thickness, the ungated region length, and contact resistance on the cutoff frequency is rigorously calculated. It is found that the cutoff frequency can have about 90 GHz with a contact resistance of 0.4 Omega.mm and a channel whose length and thickness are 30 and 5 nm, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据