4.7 Article

Toward a Bio-Inspired Acoustic Sensor: Achroia grisella's Ear

期刊

IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL
卷 22, 期 18, 页码 17746-17753

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2022.3197841

关键词

3-D printing; Achroia grisella; acoustic sensor; bio-inspiration; insect hearing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bio-inspiration is the process of drawing insights from nature to address engineering problems. In this study, the researchers focused on directional acoustic sensing at small scales and developed a computer model based on a nocturnal moth's ear, which was then 3-D printed and experimentally tested.
Gathering insights from nature to develop original solutions for engineering problems is known as bio-inspiration. The examples found in nature are often efficient and beautifully simple. For the particular issue of directional acoustic sensing at small scales, insects provide a myriad of clever adaptations to achieve hearing despite their small body size. Achroia grisella is a nocturnal moth capable of directional hearing of wavelengths significantly longer than its intertympanic distance. Previous studies have shown that directionality for this moth is monoaural and exclusively relies on the shape of the eardrum itself. The work developed a computer model that behaves similar to the moth's ear, which is then 3-D printed. The model starts from a simplified circular membrane and progresses until it reflects the moth's tympanum more closely. The approach consists of four steps: considering analytical equations, virtually simulating the model, manufacturing and performing experimental measurements, and finally comparing the outcomes of each. Equations are produced for the simplest geometries, and COMSOL Multiphysics is used for the simulations. The samples are manufactured via 3-D printing and excited with a vibrating piezoelectric chip and a speaker while being measured with a 3-D laser Doppler vibrometer to determine their frequency and directional responses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据