4.7 Article

Brillouin Frequency Estimation in Distributed Brillouin Optical Fiber Sensors

期刊

IEEE SENSORS JOURNAL
卷 22, 期 19, 页码 18501-18507

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JSEN.2022.3200989

关键词

Scattering; Oscillators; Time-domain analysis; Time-frequency analysis; Damping; Fitting; Frequency estimation; Brillouin scattering; distributed optical fiber sensors; instantaneous frequency (IF); time-domain analysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [61875246, 62075086]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel method based on instantaneous frequency analysis is proposed to lower the complexity and measurement time cost of Brillouin frequency analysis. Experimental results show that this method outperforms the traditional short-time Fourier transform (STFT) algorithm in terms of performance.
Short-time Fourier transform (STFT) algorithm with Lorentzian fitting is popular in distributed Brillouin optical fiber sensors to acquire Brillouin frequency. However, STFT often suffers from the tradeoff between Brillouin frequency measurement resolution and computation complexity. To lower the complexity of Brillouin frequency analysis and speedup measurement, a novel method based on instantaneous frequency (IF) analysis is proposed. The instantaneous Brillouin frequency can be obtained through the instantaneous phase change between two adjacent samples in the time domain. The requirement on the spectral resolution is, therefore, greatly relaxed, significantly reducing computation complexity and lowering measurement time cost. A Brillouin optical time-domain reflectometry (BOTDR) scheme is demonstrated with a spatial resolution of 1.2 m over a 5-km sensing fiber. For an average count of 4096 over measurements, experiments show that the IF algorithm can reduce computation complexity by 122 times at a standard deviation (STD) of 0.5065 MHz for BFS estimation which is comparable to the STD obtained through STFT in conjunction with Lorentzian fitting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据