4.6 Article

Al0.1Ga0.9N p-i-n Ultraviolet Avalanche Photodiodes With Avalanche Gain Over 106

期刊

IEEE ELECTRON DEVICE LETTERS
卷 43, 期 9, 页码 1479-1482

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LED.2022.3193755

关键词

AlGaN; avalanche photodiodes; high gain; leakage current components

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61634002]
  2. National Science Foundation of China [U1830109, U2141241]
  3. Key Research and Development Project of Jiangsu [BE2021026]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this research, Al0.1Ga0.9N p-i-n ultraviolet avalanche photodiodes (APDs) based on sapphire substrates were reported, achieving a record-high gain over 2 x 10(6). The devices fabricated with various mesa diameters demonstrated consistent avalanche behaviors and identical dark current distributions, comparable to GaN APDs grown on free-standing GaN substrates. Quadratic fitting analysis revealed that the leakage current at the breakdown voltage is a mixture of surface and bulk leakage, with the surface component comparable to the bulk. Additionally, KOH surface treatment and SiO2 passivation were proven effective in suppressing the leakage current and achieving robust avalanche performance.
We report Al0.1Ga0.9N p-i-n ultraviolet (UV) avalanche photodiodes (APDs) based on sapphire substrates with a record-high gain over 2 x 10(6). The devices fabricated with various mesa diameters present consistent avalanche behaviors and identical dark current distributions over multiple I - V scans, which are comparable to the GaN APDs grown on free-standing GaN substrates. The quadratic fitting of the dark currents versus the mesa sizes reveals that the leakage current at the breakdown voltage is a mixture of surface leakage and bulk leakage, and the surface component is comparable to that of the bulk. Additionally, KOH surface treatment and SiO2 passivation are proven to be very effective in suppressing the leakage current and achieving robust avalanche performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据