4.6 Article

First releases of hatchery-produced Senegal sole (Solea senegalensis), brill (Scophthalmus rhombus), and wedge sole (Dicologoglossa cuneata) juveniles in the South-western Spanish coast

期刊

HYDROBIOLOGIA
卷 850, 期 1, 页码 203-214

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-022-05054-w

关键词

Flatfish; Senegal sole; Fish stock enhancement; Recapture; Tag

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to describe and analyze the results of the first flatfish stock enhancements in Andalusia. The results show that it is possible to release and recover tagged Senegal soles in the Gulf of Cadiz, and future long-term enhancement programs could help recover fisheries stocks.
The regression of fisheries in the Gulf of Cadiz is evident since current fish catches are 33% of that 30 years before. Consequently, some initiatives for the replenishment of exhausted wild stocks are welcome. The objective of the present work is to describe and analyse the results coming from the first flatfish stock enhancements in Andalusia. A total of 3189 fish from three flatfish species: Senegal sole (Solea senegalensis Kaup), wedge sole (Dicologlossa cuneata Moreau), and brill (Scophthalmus rhombus Linnaeus) were tagged and released. Several variables were calculated through the data analysis of recovered fish. Some variables were calculated only for Senegal soles since wedge sole and brill recaptures were not significant. The Senegal sole recapture rate was 2.71 +/- 0.72, similar to other published data, the recapture rates for bigger fish being higher though not significant. No significant differences were detected for distance, time, growth, or recapture rate amongst initial Senegal sole sizes. Around 80% of recaptures were registered within 15 weeks after release. The results show that it is possible for the release and recovery of tagged Senegal soles in the Gulf of Cadiz. Future long-term programmes on stock enhancement could help to determine the effects on fisheries and recover stocks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据