4.6 Article

Effects of quagga mussel invasion on trophic niche of fishes in a western USA reservoir: a test for a trophic cascade and corresponding niche shift

期刊

HYDROBIOLOGIA
卷 850, 期 1, 页码 109-121

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-022-05046-w

关键词

Stable isotopes; Quagga mussels; Trophic ecology; Trophic cascades

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The invasion of quagga mussels affects the trophic niche of fish in Lake Powell, but the direction and magnitude of the effects vary significantly between different regions of the lake.
Quagga mussels (Dreissena bugensis) are considered one of the most deleterious invasive species in freshwater ecosystems because they can alter food webs by changing energy and nutrient flows. Generally, the predicted effect of quagga mussels on the trophic niche of co-occurring fish is a decrease in trophic level and a shift to use of more littoral-based energy, especially in pelagic-feeding fishes. We evaluate variation, in trophic niche of fishes in Lake Powell using stable isotopes to see if they conform to this expected pattern, and we compare current trophic niche of fishes to trophic niche measured prior to full colonization by quagga mussels. After colonization by quagga mussels in Lake Powell, trophic niche of all five fish species changed, but the direction and magnitude of change varied significantly between regions of the lake. In the southern region of the lake, some species exhibited a trend of decreasing delta N-15, (i.e., decreased trophic level), and an enrichment of delta C-13, indicating a littoral energy shift consistent with the expected effect of quagga mussels. However, in the northern region of the lake some species exhibited an increase in trophic position and a shift toward the pelagic energy pathway across the same time period. Regional differences in the lake, including extreme fluctuations in water level and high input of sediments from the Colorado River, may ameliorate the effect of quagga mussels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据