4.3 Article

X-Ray Crystallographic Studies of Quasi-Racemates for Absolute Configuration Determinations

期刊

HELVETICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 105, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/hlca.202200117

关键词

absolute configuration; atropisomerism; chirality; quasi-racemates; X-ray diffraction

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [155902, 175746]
  2. University of Basel
  3. NCCR Molecular Systems Engineering [182895]
  4. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union [101002471]
  5. European Research Council (ERC) [101002471] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The determination of absolute configuration of chiral molecular entities is crucial in stereochemistry. X-ray crystallography of quasi-racemates provides a useful approach for determining absolute configuration, especially in the development of stereoselective methods.
The determination of the absolute configuration of chiral molecular entities by means of X-ray crystallography is overall of central importance in stereochemistry. However, the growth of enantiopure single crystals often represents an unsurmountable and frustrating hurdle. Quasi-racemic crystals of biomacromolecules, for which the absolute configuration is predetermined by the chiral monomers, allowed the X-ray crystallographic analysis of systems that are difficult to crystallize as pure enantiomers, with aims other than the determination of the absolute structure. Taking advantage of the greater propensity of quasi-racemic mixtures to co-crystallize compared to growing enantiomerically pure crystals of a single compound, we herein describe the use of X-ray crystallography of quasi-racemates for the absolute configuration determination. We expect that this approach is particularly useful to establish the sense of selectivity in the development of stereoselective methods by simplified crystallizations, while confirming the consistent selectivity with a second molecular structure within the same measurement.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据