4.5 Article

Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: A critique on corticosteroid therapy

期刊

HEARING RESEARCH
卷 422, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2022.108565

关键词

Anti-inflammatory; Audiogram; Corticosteroids; Deafness; Dose-response; Intratympanic

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) is a condition that can lead to hearing loss, with an unclear incidence rate. Corticosteroids are the standard treatment option, but the available data do not support this practice, highlighting the need for further scientific validation.
Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) is a condition affecting 5-30 per 10 0,0 0 0 individ-uals with the potential to significantly reduce one's quality of life. The true incidence of this condition is not known because it often goes undiagnosed and/or recovers within a few days. ISSNHL is defined as a >= 30 dB loss of hearing over 3 consecutive audiometric octaves within 3 days with no known cause. The disorder is typically unilateral and most of the cases spontaneously recover to functional hearing within 30 days. High frequency losses, ageing, and vertigo are associated with a poorer prognosis. Multi-ple causes of ISSNHL have been postulated and the most common are vascular obstruction, viral infection, or labyrinthine membrane breaks. Corticosteroids are the standard treatment option but this practice is not without opposition. Post mortem analyses of temporal bones of ISSNHL cases have been inconclusive. This report analyzed ISSNHL studies administering corticosteroids that met strict inclusion criteria and identified a number of methodologic shortcomings that compromise the interpretation of results. We discuss the issues and conclude that the data do not support present treatment practices. The current status on ISSNHL calls for a multi-institutional, randomized, double-blind trial with validated outcome measures to provide science-based treatment guidance. (c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据