4.4 Review

Efficacy of botulinum toxin injection versus bilateral medial rectus recession for comitant esotropia: a meta-analysis

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00417-022-05882-5

关键词

Comitant esotropia; Surgical treatment; Botulinum toxin injection; Meta-analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared the effectiveness of botulinum toxin injection (BTX) and bilateral medial rectus recession (BMR) in the treatment of comitant esotropia. The results showed that BMR had a higher success rate and a lower undercorrection rate compared to BTX, particularly for infantile esotropia. However, there were similar treatment effects between BTX and BMR in the treatment of acute acquired comitant esotropia.
Objective To compare the effectiveness of botulinum toxin injection (BTX) and bilateral medial rectus recession (BMR) in the treatment of comitant esotropia. Methods An exhaustive search of the literature from Pubmed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases was carried out until April 2022. No language restrictions were applied. The literature was rigorously screened against eligibility criteria. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. Results A total of 9 articles with 1100 participants were included in this meta-analysis. Three studies compared the effects of BTX to BMR on infantile esotropia, five studies compared the effects of BTX to BMR on acute acquired comitant esotropia, and one study compared the therapeutic effects between BTX and BMR for partially accommodative esotropia. Our pooled results showed that BMR achieved higher overall success rate compared with BTX (OR, 0.49; 95%CI, 0.37-0.64; P < 0.001) and patients subjected to the BTX procedure had higher overall rate of undercorrection (OR, 2.27; 95%CI,1.71-3.02; P < 0.001). No statistical difference in the overall overcorrection rate was observed between the two groups (OR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.17 similar to 1.03, P = 0.06). Further analysis found that BMR was more effective for infantile esotropia compared to botulinum toxin injections (OR, 0.40; 95%CI, 0.27-0.57; P < 0.001). Nevertheless, the same effect was observed for BMR and BTX in the treatment of acute acquired comitant esotropia (OR, 0.97; 95%CI, 0.50-1.87; P = 0.93). Conclusion The present meta-analysis indicated that the BMR procedure achieved a higher success rate and a lower undercorrection rate in patients with comitant esotropia. However, BTX demonstrated similar treatment effects to BMR surgery in the treatment of acute acquired comitant esotropia.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据