4.7 Article

Carbon hysteresis hypothesis as a new approach to emission behavior: A case of top five emitters

期刊

GONDWANA RESEARCH
卷 109, 期 -, 页码 171-182

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gr.2022.05.002

关键词

Positive hysteresis; Negative hysteresis; Path dependence; EKC hypothesis; Panel unit root

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explains the dramatic increases in emissions by proposing the carbon hysteresis hypothesis and reveals the direction of hysteresis. The results show that the carbon hysteresis hypothesis is valid for China, India, Japan, Russian Federation, and the USA, the top-five emitting countries.
The purpose of the current study is to explain the unstoppable dramatic increases in emissions by proposing a new hypothesis as carbon hysteresis hypothesis. If the emissions have a path dependence or a unit root, a given shock to the emissions will make its equilibrium to a new level in long-run. In this case, the carbon hysteresis hypothesis will be valid. On the other hand, if the emission series is stationary, emissions will resist given shocks in long-run, hence there will be no hysteresis effect. Furthermore, this study reveals the direction of hysteresis. Accordingly, the positive hysteresis indicates continuous increase in emissions while the negative hysteresis indicates continuous decrease in emissions that means carbon reduction.This study achieves robust results by three different structural break panel unit root strategies. In doing so, the panel unit root tests are performed to test carbon hysteresis on the top-five emitting countries: China, India, Japan, Russian Federation and USA over the time period 1965-2020.The main conclusion is that the carbon hysteresis hypothesis is valid for these countries. Moreover, we estimated six different trend models for each regime of sample period for all countries to determine the direction of the hysteresis. In conclusion, this study proposes a new hypothesis to assist countries on their way to the reduction targets.(c) 2022 International Association for Gondwana Research. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据