4.7 Article

Sub-Lithospheric Small-Scale Convection Tomographically Imaged Beneath the Pacific Plate

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 49, 期 18, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2022GL100351

关键词

oceanic lithosphere; asthenosphere; mantle convection; body wave tomography; ocean bottom seismometer

资金

  1. NSF [OCE-1658491, OCE-1658214, OCE-1658070, OCE-2051265]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study provides observational support for small-scale convective rolls beneath the oceanic plates. The study found alternating upper mantle velocity anomalies aligned with gravity lineations beneath the seafloor. These anomalies, likely caused by temperature variations and possible partial melting, are strongest in deeper regions, indicating rapid vertical motions through a low-viscosity asthenospheric channel.
Small-scale convection beneath the oceanic plates has been invoked to explain off-axis nonplume volcanism, departure from simple seafloor depth-age relationships, and intraplate gravity lineations. We deployed 30 broadband ocean bottom seismometer stations on similar to 40 Ma Pacific seafloor in a region notable for gravity anomalies, measured by satellite altimetry, elongated parallel to plate motion. P-wave teleseismic tomography reveals alternating upper mantle velocity anomalies on the order of +/- 2%, aligned with the gravity lineations. These features, which correspond to similar to 300 degrees-500 degrees K lateral temperature contrast, and possible hydrous or carbonatitic partial melt, are-surprisingly-strongest between 150 and 260 km depth, indicating rapid vertical motions through a low-viscosity asthenospheric channel. Coherence and admittance analysis of gravity and topography using new multibeam bathymetry soundings substantiates the presence of mantle density variations, and forward modeling predicts gravity anomalies that qualitatively match observed lineations. This study provides observational support for small-scale convective rolls beneath the oceanic plates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据