4.7 Article

Planet Size Controls Fe Isotope Fractionation Between Mantle and Core

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
卷 49, 期 20, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2022GL098451

关键词

core formation; iron isotope fractionation; NRIXS; high pressure

资金

  1. Carnegie Institution for Science
  2. IPGP visiting faculty program
  3. National Science Foundation [EAR-1851736]
  4. UnivEarthS Labex program at Sorbonne Paris Cite [ANR-10-LABX-0023, ANR-11-IDEX-0005-02]
  5. European Research Council under the European Union [101019965]
  6. DOE Office of Science by Argonne National Laboratory [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  7. European Research Council (ERC) [101019965] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The isotopic composition of iron shows variations in different planetary reservoirs, reflecting the differentiation and evolution processes of their parent bodies. Experimental results suggest that iron isotope fractionation during core formation on terrestrial planets may lead to a heavy mantle.
As an element ubiquitous in the Solar system, the isotopic composition of iron exhibits rich variations in different planetary reservoirs. Such variations reflect the diverse range of differentiation and evolution processes experienced by their parent bodies. A key in deciphering iron isotope variations among planetary samples is to understand how iron isotopes fractionate during core formation. Here we report new Nuclear Resonant Inelastic X-ray Scattering experiments on silicate glasses of bulk silicate Earth compositions to measure their force constants at high pressures of up to 30 GPa. The force constant results are subsequently used to constrain iron isotope fractionation during core formation on terrestrial planets. Using a model that integrates temperature, pressure, core composition, and redox state of the silicate mantle, we show that core formation might lead to an isotopically light mantle for small planetary bodies but a heavy one for Earth-sized terrestrial planets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据