4.6 Article

Separating GIA signal from surface mass change using GPS and GRACE data

期刊

GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL
卷 232, 期 1, 页码 537-547

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggac336

关键词

Geopotential theory; Global change from geodesy; Loading of the Earth; Satellite gravity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The visco-elastic response of the solid Earth to glacial cycles and surface mass change can be detected using geodetic observation systems. In order to better understand current surface mass change driven by climate change, it is necessary to consider the glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) signal. A new framework is proposed that uses geophysical relations to estimate data-driven GIA solutions, which differ significantly from traditional forward models in certain regions.
The visco-elastic response of the solid Earth to the past glacial cycles and the present-day surface mass change (PDSMC) are detected by the geodetic observation systems such as global navigation satellite system and satellite gravimetry. Majority of the contemporary PDSMC is driven by climate change and in order to better understand them using the aforementioned geodetic observations, glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) signal should be accounted first. The default approach is to use forward GIA models that use uncertain ice-load history and approximate Earth rheology to predict GIA, yielding large uncertainties. The proliferation of contemporary, global, geodetic observations and their coverage have therefore enabled estimation of data-driven GIA solutions. A novel framework is presented that uses geophysical relations between the vertical land motion (VLM) and geopotential anomaly due to GIA and PDSMC to express GPS VLM trends and GRACE geopotential trends as a function of either GIA or PDSMC, which can be easily solved using least-squares regression. The GIA estimates are data-driven and differ significantly from forward models over Alaska and Greenland.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据