4.6 Article

Spatial and temporal trends in California coastal cliff retreat

期刊

GEOMORPHOLOGY
卷 412, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2022.108318

关键词

Coastal cliffs; Cliff erosion; LiDAR; California coast

资金

  1. California Ocean Protection Council [C0303100]
  2. California Department of Parks and Recreation, Natural Resources Division Oceanography Program [C1670004, C19E0049]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Airborne LiDAR datasets were used to measure erosion and retreat along 866 km of California coastal cliffs between 2009-2011 and 2016. The results showed that erosion exceeding the level of detection was observed at 55% of cliffs, with more erosion in northern California compared to southern and central California. Retreat rates were higher for unarmored cliffs and cliffs fronted by sandy beaches. The average cliff top retreat rates were lower than in previous studies, but the average cliff face retreat rates were similar for different time periods.
Airborne LiDAR datasets were used to measure erosion and retreat along 866 km of California coastal cliffs between 2009-2011 and 2016. Erosion exceeding the level of detection was observed at 55% of cliffs. State-averaged cliff face and top retreat rates were both 0.06 m yr(-1), and varied alongshore, with more erosion in northern California compared to southern and central California. Retreat rates were higher for unarmored cliffs and cliffs fronted by sandy beaches. Mean cliff top retreat rates were lower than in previous studies conducted between the 1920s-1930s and 1998/2002, and between 1998 and 2009-2011. However, the average cliff face retreat rates and statistical distributions were similar (r(2) = 0.99) for the 1998 to 2009-2011 and 2009-2011 to 2016 time periods. No significant correlation was found between cliff erosion rates and environmental factors such as rock hardness, rainfall, groundwater, waves, and relative sea level change. However, the highest cliff face retreat rates (>1 m yr(-1)) occurred at locations with weak rocks.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据