4.7 Article

Soil pH does not interfere with nitrification inhibitor efficiency for reducing N2O emissions from soils treated with concentrated vinasse and urea

期刊

GEODERMA
卷 426, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.116087

关键词

Concentrated vinasse; Bioenergy; Nitrous oxide; Residue management

资金

  1. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) [2018/20793-9]
  2. [2017/02299-4]
  3. [2019/12557-6]
  4. [2018/20698-6]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study assessed the effectiveness of a potential nitrification inhibitor in reducing nitrous oxide emissions from the joint application of concentrated vinasse and urea in soils with different pH values. The results showed that soil pH had a significant impact on N2O emissions, but had little effect on the efficiency of the nitrification inhibitor.
This study addresses the assessment of potential nitrification inhibitor (NI) 3,4-dimethylpyrazol-phosphate for mitigation of nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions from the joint application of concentrated vinasse (CV) and urea in soils under different pHs. An incubation experiment was performed under controlled conditions to evaluate the effect of the organo-mineral fertilization containing CV and Urea (N rate: 120 kg N ha(-1)) on N2O emissions, as well as the efficiency of the NI addition, at different soil pHs (4.5 and 6.0). The treatments were: Control; Urea; Urea + NI; CV; CV + Urea; and CV + Urea + NI. The soil pH greatly influenced the N2O production with emissions 3.8-fold higher at pH 6.0 than at pH 4.5. Besides, the joint application of CV + Urea increased the N2O emissions by 1.3 and 2.9-fold (185 and 1141 mg N m(-2)) compared to Urea treatment (138 and 391 mg N m(-2)) at pH 4.5 and 6.0, respectively. The addition of NI was efficient under both soil pHs, decreasing N2O emissions by 92 and 88 % in the Urea treatment and 71 % and 91 % in the CV + Urea treatment at pH 4.5 and 6.0, respectively. Our results indicate that soil pH has a large influence on N2O emissions and little effect on the NI efficiency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据