4.7 Article

Associations of genome-wide cell-free DNA fragmentation profiles with blood biochemical and hematological parameters in healthy individuals

期刊

GENOMICS
卷 114, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2022.110504

关键词

Cell-free DNA; Fragmentomics; Hematology; Biochemical parameters; Liver enzyme

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province
  3. [82072360]
  4. [82072624]
  5. [LBY20H160002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to explore the correlation between cfDNA fragment distribution and blood biochemical and hematological parameters in healthy individuals. The findings suggest that cfDNA fragment distribution is associated with physiological parameters related to cardiovascular risk factors, inflammatory response, and hepatocyte injury.
Cell-free DNA (cfDNA), as a non-invasive approach, has been introduced in a wide range of applications, including cancer diagnosis/ monitoring, prenatal testing, and transplantation monitoring. Yet, studies of cfDNA fragmentomics in physiological conditions are lacking. In this study, we aim to explore the correlation of frag-mentation patterns of cfDNA with blood biochemical and hematological parameters in healthy individuals. We addressed the impact of physiological variables and abnormal blood biochemical and hematological parameters on cfDNA fragment size distribution. We also figured and validated that hematological inflammation markers, including leukocyte, lymphocyte, neutrophil, and platelet distribution width as well as aspartate transaminase levels were significantly correlated with the genome-wide cfDNA fragmentation pattern. Our findings suggest that cfDNA fragmentation profiles were associated with physiological parameters related to cardiovascular risk factors, inflammatory response and hepatocyte injury, which may provide insights for further research on the potential role of cfDNA fragmentation in diagnosis and monitor of several disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据