4.6 Article

A de novo mutation (p.S1419F) of Retinoic acid induced 1 is responsible for a patient with Smith-Magenis syndrome exhibiting schizophrenia

期刊

GENE
卷 851, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2022.147028

关键词

RAI1; Smith-Magenis syndrome schizophrenia; Headache

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report a novel mutation of RAI1 in a patient with Smith-Magenis syndrome, schizophrenia, and headache. The mutation affects a conserved site of RAI1 and leads to decreased protein levels. This finding expands the spectrum of RAI1 mutations and contributes to the understanding of the mechanisms underlying SMS, schizophrenia, and headache.
Smith-Magenis syndrome (SMS, OMIM# 182290) is a rare congenital disorder which characterized by multiple abnormalities involving in craniofacial, skeletal, otorhinolaryngolocial, neurological, behavioral and others. 17p11.2 microdeletion and RAI1 mutations have been proven to be genetic lesions of this disease. However, the relationship between RAI1 variants and different phenotypes is still unclear. The discoveries of more RAI1 mutations in patients with different phenotypes will help to elucidate the pathogenesis of the RAI1 gene. Here, we describe a young patient with schizophrenia and headache as the main clinical presentation, with SMS-like features including depression, sleep disturbance and pain-free status. Whole exome sequencing and Sanger sequencing suggested that a de novo mutation (NM_030665.3: c.4256C > T/p.S1419F) of RAI1 may be the genetic lesion of the patient. The bioinformatic program predicted that the new mutation (p.S1419F), located in an evolutionarily conserved site of RAI1, was deleterious. Further, western blot analysis suggested that the novel mutation may decrease the protein levels of RAI1 in the patient. Hence, we reported a novel mutation of RAI1 in a patient with SMS, schizophrenia and headache. Our study may expand the spectrum of RAI1 mutations which may further contribute to the mechanisms underlying SMS, schizophrenia and headache.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据