4.7 Article

Partial oxidation gasification kinetics of indole in supercritical water for hydrogen production

期刊

FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY
卷 236, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2022.107377

关键词

Supercritical water gasification; Partial oxidation; Hydrogen peroxide; Kinetics; Indole

资金

  1. National Key Research and Devel- opment Program of China [2021YFE0104900]
  2. Projects from National Natural Science Foundation of China [22078258]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [xtr052022009, xtr042019015, xjh012019005, CEEC2021001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the pathways and kinetics of hydrogen production from indole gasification in supercritical water. The addition of an oxidant was found to enhance gasification efficiency and increase the yields of H2 and CO2.
Indole is one of refractory intermediate products in hydrothermal conversion of biomass, and its decomposition significantly restricts the improvement of gasification efficiency and hydrogen production in biomass supercritical water gasification (SCWG). In order to improve gasification efficiency of indole and moderate reaction conditions for hydrogen production in biomass SCWG, indole (0.25 mol/L) was gasified in supercritical water at 540-600 degrees C, 25 MPa, 0-0.8 of oxidation coefficients (OC) in min-batch reactors. Corresponding pathways and kinetics of partial oxidation of indole in supercritical water for hydrogen production were explored. The results showed that the addition of oxidant (hydrogen peroxide) promoted steam reform and decomposition, especially ring-opening reactions, so increasing the gasification efficiency of indole and the yields of H2 and CO2 in gaseous products. The maximum hydrogen gasification efficiency could reach up to 60.3% at OC = 0.6, which was about twice that of non-oxidant. Moreover, 29 groups of reaction rate constants, activation energies and Arrhenius constants were obtained in the established kinetic model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据