4.7 Article

Recent advances on solid acid catalyic systems for production of 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural from biomass derivatives

期刊

FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY
卷 234, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2022.107338

关键词

Biomass; HMF; Solid acid catalysts; Reaction mechanisms; Separate

资金

  1. Foundation of Modern Agricultural Innovation Center, Henan Institute of Sun Yat-sen University [N2021-002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article reviews the research progress of solid acid catalysts in the conversion of biomass to 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF). The advantages and disadvantages of different catalytic systems are evaluated, and the latest methods for the reactor, segregation, and depuration of HMF are discussed. This provides valuable insight for the design of efficient new solid acid catalysts and the promotion of industrial HMF production.
5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF), a value-added platform chemical, is used as a bridge between biomass raw materials and industrial application products in the process of biorefinery. At present, HMF is generally obtained by catalyzing the dehydration of C6 sugar, and then transformed into various high value-added chemical products. Among several widely used heterogeneous catalysts, solid acid catalysts have been widely studied for effectively catalyzing biomass to produce HMF. In this practice we intend to explore the research progress of solid acid catalysts in the conversion of biomass to HMF. This article evaluates the advantages and disadvantages of metal oxides, carbon-based catalysts, zeolites, MOFs and resins. The effects of different catalytic systems on improving catalytic activity and HMF selectivity were introduced and compared. In addition, the latest methods for the reactor, segregation and depuration of HMF in recent years are reviewed, which will help to provide some valuable enlightenment for the design of efficient new solid acid catalysts and promoting the industrial production of HMF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据