4.7 Article

Kinetics of hydrothermal carbonization of kitchen waste based on multi-component reaction mechanism

期刊

FUEL
卷 324, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.124693

关键词

Kitchen waste; Waste to energy; Hydrothermal carbonization; Feedstock component; Kinetic model

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51976069]
  2. Key Research and Development Program of Hubei Province [2021BCA157]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposed a kinetic model of hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) for kitchen waste by studying the multi-component reaction mechanism. The model accurately predicted product yields and provided guidance for the utilization of HTC products from kitchen waste.
Hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) is a suitable method to pretreat kitchen waste with high moisture content and complex composition. Developing a precise kinetic model can accurately predict the yields of products to obtain better economic benefits in subsequent utilization, such as fuel. This study aimed to propose an HTC kinetic model of kitchen waste by studying the multi-component reaction mechanism. The HTC reactions of multi component kitchen waste could be summarized as three key reactions: carbonization of carbohydrates, the Maillard reaction, and the amidation reaction. These reactions were reflected in the kinetic model. Moreover, the calculated results indicated the fitting degree reached 0.9995, which accurately simulated the hydrothermal process of kitchen waste. This model illustrated the rate and extent of the reaction between the components. The kinetic results showed that the rate constant of carbonization of carbohydrates was 0.0012, and that of the Maillard reaction and the amidation reaction were 0.0998 and 0.1409, respectively. The amidation reaction competed with the Maillard reaction and dominated the reaction of the constant-temperature stage. This model provided preliminary guidance for regulating and utilizing HTC products from kitchen waste in different institutions and regions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据