期刊
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT
卷 519, 期 -, 页码 -出版社
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120302
关键词
Fire management; Fuel management; Fuel treatments effectiveness; Mediterranean-type ecosystems
类别
资金
- Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) - Ministry of Science, Technology and Higher Education [PD/BD/142961/2018]
- European Social Fund - Operational Program Human Capital within the 2014-2020 EU Strategic Framework [PD/00157/2012]
- research project FIRE-MODSAT II [PTDC/ASP-SIL/28771/2017]
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PD/BD/142961/2018, PTDC/ASP-SIL/28771/2017] Funding Source: FCT
This study analyzed the effect of prescribed burning (PB) on reducing wildfire extent in southern Europe using fire mapping data from Portugal. The results showed an increase in the number of larger wildfires during the PB era, suggesting that other factors are counteracting its supposed effect. The most important variables affecting wildfire extent were fire weather and ignition density, with a positive effect, and past wildfire and PB extent, with a negative effect.
Prescribed burning (PB) is increasingly recognised as a viable, cost-effective technique for reducing wildfire risk. Yet, quantification of the effect of PB on the reduction of wildfire extent in southern Europe is non-existent. We used 35 years of fire mapping data in Portugal to analyse wildfire regime metrics in nine landscapes before (1985-2004) and during (2005-2020), the period when systematic use of PB to reduce fuel load began. We employed robust linear mixed models and generalized linear mixed models to examine the role of annual wildfire extent drivers at landscape scales and quantified the effect of PB on the reduction of subsequent wildfire extent, i. e., leverage. We found evidence of larger wildfires during the PB era, suggesting that other influences are counteracting its putative effect. The most important variables explaining wildfire extent were fire weather and ignition density, with positive effect, and past wildfire and PB extent, with negative effect, corresponding to leverage. We obtained a total past fire (PB and wildfire) leverage of 0.28, i.e., approximately 4 ha of past fire decrease subsequent wildfire by 1 ha, increasing to 0.84 if only landscapes with high wildfire incidence are considered. The analyses failed to unequivocally identify a direct leverage effect of PB but a 1:5 return-for-effort is reasonable as a conservative estimate. Increasing the size of PB treatments and treatment effort in the landscape in combination with fire-modelling assisted planning would enhance PB leverage, making it more effective at reducing wildfire extent, rather than functioning only as a supplement to the effect of previous wildfires.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据