4.6 Review

Residual Risk of Avermectins in Food Products of Animal Origin and Their Research Progress on Toxicity and Determination

期刊

FOOD REVIEWS INTERNATIONAL
卷 39, 期 9, 页码 7019-7047

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/87559129.2022.2132402

关键词

Avermectins; residue limits; toxicity; analytical methods; food products of animal origin

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper provides an overview of the residual risk and toxicity of Avermectins (AVMs) in animal-derived food products, as well as summarizing the analytical methods used for their detection. It highlights the need for further research on the environmental impacts of AVMs and the potential toxicological significance of food contamination.
Avermectins (AVMs) are categorised as highly effective but toxic natural products isolated from Streptomyces avermitilis and are widely applied as antihelminthic and antiparasitic agents in agriculture and aquaculture. AVMs accumulated in the environment through runoff, spray drift, field drainage, or from pharmaceutical drugs used for aquatic farming, which resulted in toxic effects on nontarget aquatic and terrestrial organisms and caused residues in food products of animal origin. There was a lack of comprehensive overview for residual risk of AVMs in food products of animal origin and their research progress on toxicity and determination. This paper introduced the structure and chemical properties of AVMs, then updated and classified residue limits of AVMs in food products of animal origin established by Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC), European Union (EU), United States, Japan, and China. The toxicity of AVMs and analytical methods of AVMs in food products of animal origin were summarized. Besides, the residues of AVMs in food products of animal origin were analyzed. Further researches for impacts of AVMs on environment and potential toxicological significance of food contamination by AVMs are needed to understand their risk in the environment and food chain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据