4.7 Article

Sensomics analysis of the effect of the withering method on the aroma components of Keemun black tea

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 395, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.133549

关键词

Keemun black tea; Withering method; Aroma; GC-O

资金

  1. National Key Research & Develop-ment Plan [2021YFD1601100]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzed the aroma composition of Keemun black tea (KBT) under different withering methods, including natural withering, sun withering, and warm-air withering. Significant differences were found among the three samples. Eleven aroma-active compounds were identified as responsible for the differences in aroma caused by different withering methods. Linalool and geraniol were responsible for flowery and fruity aromas when sun withering was applied, while methional contributed to the intense roasty aroma when warm air withering was employed. The results were further validated by quantitative descriptive analysis and addition experiments.
Withering is a key process that affects the aroma of Keemun black tea (KBT). In this study, the aroma composition of KBT through natural withering, sun withering, and warm-air withering was analysed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The results revealed significant differences in the three samples. Gas chromatography-olfactometry and aroma extract dilution analysis were performed with screening through a relative odour activity value (rOAV) > 1. In total, 11 aroma-active compounds (geraniol, (Z)-4-heptenal, 1-octen-3-ol, (E)-beta-ionone, 3-methylbutanal, linalool, beta-damascenone, (E, E)-2,4-decadienal, methional, (E, E)-2,4-nonadienal, and (E)-2-nonenal) were found to be responsible for the differences in aroma caused by different withering methods. Linalool (rOAV, 161) and geraniol (rOAV, 785) were responsible for the higher flowery and fruity aromas when sun withering was applied, whereas methional (rOAV, 124) contributed to the intense roasty aroma when warm air withering was employed. Moreover, our results were verified by quantitative descriptive analysis and addition experiments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据