4.7 Article

Identification of novel saltiness-enhancing peptides from yeast extract and their mechanism of action for transmembrane channel-like 4 (TMC4) protein through experimental and integrated computational modeling

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 388, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132993

关键词

Yeast extract; Saltiness enhancing peptides; TMC4; Salty receptor protein; Artificial intelligence

资金

  1. Angel Yeast Co. Ltd.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Excessive consumption of sodium salt is an important factor in cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, making research on low-sodium salt crucial. This study used various methods to purify and identify salty enhancing peptides in yeast extracts and discovered the taste-enhancing properties of PN, NSE, NE, and SPE through sensory evaluation. The taste mechanisms of these peptides were also investigated.
Excessive consumption of sodium salt is one of the important inducers of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. The reduction of physical labor and attention to health make research on low-sodium salt imminent. Ultrafiltration, gel filtration, preparative high-performance liquid chromatography, and liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry were employed for further purification and identification of the salty enhancing peptides in yeast extracts. Moreover, human transmembrane channel-like 4 (TMC4) was constructed and evaluated by computer-based methods, and salt-enhancing peptides were identified based on its allosteric sites. PN, NSE, NE and SPE were further determined to be salty enhancing peptides through sensory evaluation, and their taste mechanism was investigated. The results presented here suggest that silicon screening focused on TMC4 allosteric sites and sensory evaluation experiments can greatly increase the discoverability and identifiability of salty enhancer peptides, and this strategy is the first to be applied to the development of salty enhancer peptides.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据