4.7 Article

Fruit quality parameters and volatile compounds from 'Palmer' mangoes with internal breakdown

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 388, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132902

关键词

Mango physiological disorder; Volatiles; Postharvest quality; Chemometrics

资金

  1. Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) [001]
  2. FAPESP [2019/13656-8, 2019/05159-4]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research evaluated the ability to predict pulp internal breakdown in mangoes by analyzing physicochemical properties and volatile compounds. Principal components analysis and partial least squares discriminant analysis showed that color, firmness, and volatile compounds play an important role in providing information about the physiological changes caused by IB. By identifying volatile compounds as chemical markers, a combination of mango physical and chemical characteristics with PCA and PLS-DA successfully distinguished between healthy and IB fruits.
The internal breakdown (IB) is a premature and uneven mango pulp ripening physiological disorder that is noticed only when the fruit is sliced for consumption. Thus, there is a demand for analytical methods to detect IB in mangoes to avoid consumer dissatisfaction and reduce postharvest waste. In this work, physicochemical and volatile compounds were determined to evaluate the ability to predict pulp IB. Principal components analysis (PCA) and partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) of the data show that color, firmness, and volatiles compounds are important to give some information about the physiological changes caused by IB. The volatile compounds methacrylic acid, ethyl ester, isopentyl ethanoate, limonene oxide, (E)-2-pentenal, tetradecane, and gamma-elemene were identified as chemical markers of IB. Therefore, mango physical and chemical characteristics combined with PCA and PLS-DA were successfully employed for the identification of IB in mangoes, showing significant differences between healthy and IB fruits.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据