4.7 Article

Could elderberry fruits processed by modern and conventional drying and extraction technology be considered a valuable source of health-promoting compounds?

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 405, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.134766

关键词

Elderberry; Drying techniques; Extraction techniques; Polyphenols; Biological potential; Sambucus nigra L

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The results of this study suggest that lyophilization is a better drying technique than natural convection, and microwave extraction is the most efficient technique for isolating secondary metabolites. Phenolic compounds, particularly chlorogenic acid and rutin, were found in abundance in extracts of lyophilized elderberries. Elderberry extracts showed great antioxidant and enzyme inhibition potential. These findings highlight the potential use of elderberry as a natural source of bioactive compounds for the development of dietary supplements and functional foods.
The influence of drying and extraction processes on the phytochemical composition and biopotential of elderberry is challenging for the food industry. For this reason in this research two drying techniques (lyophilization and natural convection) and three extraction techniques (ultrasound (UAE), microwave (MAE), and conventional (maceration (MAC)) was applied using twogreen solvents (water and 50 % ethanol). Results of the research showed that lyophilization was a better way of drying than natural convection, while MAE extraction was the most efficient technique for the isolation of secondary metabolites. The most abundant phenolic compounds established by LC-MS/MS analysis, were chlorogenic acid and rutin, identified in extracts of lyophilized elderberries. Elderberry extracts achieved great antioxidant (CUPRAC: 2.30-5.13 mg TE/mL) and enzyme inhibitor potential (alpha-amylase: 0.51-8.34 mg ACAE/mL). The results suggest that elderberry is a rich natural source of bioactive compounds and could be used for the future development of dietary supplements and functional foods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据