4.7 Article

All-natural protein-polysaccharide conjugates with bead-on-a-string nanostructures as stabilizers of high internal phase emulsions for 3D printing

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 388, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.133012

关键词

Shiitake mushroom; Protein-polysaccharide conjugates; Bead-on-a-string nanostructures; High internal phase emulsions; 3D printing

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foun-dation of China [31901602]
  2. Collaborative Innovation Center of Food Safety and Quality Control in Jiangsu Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a study on using natural protein-polysaccharide conjugates (PPCs) extracted from shiitake mushroom roots to stabilize high internal phase emulsions (HIPEs). The unique nanostructures of PPCs play an important role in the preparation of HIPEs, providing excellent long-term stability and heat tolerance. Additionally, HIPEs can be used for three-dimensional printing to produce self-standing objects of different shapes.
The combination of proteins and polysaccharides creates an exceptional platform for stabilizing biphasic systems such as oil in water emulsions. In this paper, we propose the use of natural protein-polysaccharide conjugates (PPCs) extracted from shiitake mushroom roots to stabilize high internal phase emulsions (HIPEs). The PPCs had bead-on-a-string nanostructures with bead (300 nm in diameter) and string (50 nm in thickness) structures corresponding to proteins and polysaccharides, respectively. Having spaced compartments with favourable amphiphilic properties, the PPCs had a three-phase contact angle close to 90, which were harnessed for the preparation of HIPEs with excellent long-term storage stability (30 d) and heat tolerance (90 degrees C). The HIPEs were amenable to three-dimensional printing, yielding different objects with strong self-standing and high structural resolution properties. This paper presents a good example of how these unique PPC structures can provide HIPE and in food

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据