4.7 Article

Selective transportation and energy homeostasis regulation of dietary advanced glycation end-products in human intestinal Caco-2 cells

期刊

FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 391, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.133284

关键词

Advanced glycation end-products; Transmembrane transport; Energy homeostasis; Mitochondria; AMPK signaling pathway

资金

  1. Key Project of Guangzhou ST Program [201904020005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study identifies the selective transmembrane transport of different modification types of AGEs and their effects on cellular energy homeostasis. The results show that only certain types of free and peptide-bound AGEs can easily cross the cell membrane and exert their effects. Mechanistically, free AGEs interfere with mitochondrial function and energy production through the thymidine phosphorylase and AMPK-SIRT6 signaling pathways.
Advanced glycation end-products (AGEs) are a chemically heterogeneous set of modifications widely found in processed foods. Due to uncertain bioavailability, dietary AGEs regulate energy homeostasis through mechanisms that largely remain unclear. In this study, selective transmembrane transport of AGEs with different modification types from glycated beta-casein digest were identified and compared. The results showed that only a few types of free and peptide-bound AGEs can easily cross the Caco-2 monolayers and thus exert their effects. A combination of biochemical assays, mitochondrial analyses, and comparative experiments identified that the effect of AGEs on cellular energy homeostasis comes mainly from their free fractions. Mechanistically, free AGEs arrest the mitochondrial differentiation and mtDNA repair by intervening in the function of thymidine phosphorylase, and interfering with mitochondrial energy production by inhibiting the activation of AMPK-SIRT6 signaling pathway. These results demonstrate mechanisms by which processed foods cause mitochondrial dysfunction and lead to dysfunctional energy homeostasis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据