4.5 Article

Hybrid, Interpretable Machine Learning for Thermodynamic Property Estimation using Grammar2vec for Molecular Representation

期刊

FLUID PHASE EQUILIBRIA
卷 561, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.fluid.2022.113531

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Science Foundation (NSF) [2132142]
  2. Emerging Frontiers & Multidisciplinary Activities
  3. Directorate For Engineering [2132142] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a Grammar2vec framework based on SMILES grammar is proposed for generating dense and numeric molecular representations. The framework embeds molecular structural information in the grammar rules of SMILES string representations. Using Grammar2vec representations, machine learning models are built to predict the normal boiling point and critical temperature of molecules, and their performance is compared with group contribution methods. The results demonstrate that Grammar2vec is an effective approach for molecular representation.
Property prediction models have been developed for several decades with varying degrees of performance and complexity, from the group contribution-based methods to molecular simulations-based methods. An interesting issue in this area is finding an appropriate representation of molecules inherently suited for the property modeling problem. Here, we propose Grammar2vec, a SMILES grammar-based framework for generating dense, numeric molecular representations. Grammar2vec embeds molecular structural information contained in the grammar rules underlying SMILES string representations of molecules. We use Grammar2vec representations to build machine learning-based models for estimating normal boiling point (T-b) and critical temperature (T-c) and benchmark their performance against the popularly used group contribution (GC)-based methods. To ensure interpretability of the developed ML model, we perform a Shapley values-based analysis to estimate feature importance and simplify (or prune) the trained model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据