4.4 Article

Multiple Mapping Conditioning Mixing Time Scales for Turbulent Premixed Flames

期刊

FLOW TURBULENCE AND COMBUSTION
卷 110, 期 2, 页码 395-415

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10494-022-00375-1

关键词

Mixing time scale; Premixed flames; MMC; Sparse particle method

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel multiple mapping conditioning (MMC) mixing time scale model has been developed for turbulent premixed combustion. It combines time scales for different combustion regimes and uses a blending function to identify zones and reduce weighting according to the Karlovitz number. DNS simulations were used to validate the model and it was found that the new mixing time scale provides accurate predictions of flame speed and flame structure across all combustion regimes.
A novel multiple mapping conditioning (MMC) mixing time scale model for turbulent premixed combustion has been developed. It combines time scales for the flamelet and distributed flame regimes with the aid of a blending function. The blending function serves two purposes. Firstly, it helps to identify zones where the premixed flame resides and where the time scale associated with the premixed flame shall be used. Secondly, it uses the Karlovitz number to identify the turbulent premixed combustion regime and to reduce the weighting of the premixed flame time scale if Karlovitz numbers are high and deviations from the flamelet regime are expected. A series of three-dimensional direct numerical simulations (DNS) of statistically one dimensional, freely propagating turbulent methane-air flames provides a wide range of turbulent combustion regimes for the mixing model validation. The new mixing time scale provides correct predictions of the flame speed of freely propagating turbulent flames which could not be matched by most recognized mixing models. The turbulent flame structure predicted by the new model is in good agreement with DNS for all combustion regimes from flamelet to the thickened reaction zone.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据