4.7 Review

Preconception weight loss in the obese patient: overhyped or underutilized?

期刊

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
卷 118, 期 3, 页码 431-433

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.07.026

关键词

Obesity; pregnancy; weight loss; lifestyle; morbidity

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The associations between female obesity and adverse maternal and fetal outcomes have been extensively documented, including ovulatory dysfunction, delayed time to pregnancy, increased pregnancy loss, fetal anomalies, gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, preterm delivery, large for gestational age infants, and thromboembolic events. The role of preconception weight loss and its risk benefit ratio is uncertain, and the effects of obesity and preconception weight loss in males are less known.
The associations between female obesity and adverse maternal and fetal outcomes are exhaustively documented with associations with ovulatoty dysfunction, delayed time to pregnancy, increased pregnancy loss in all trimesters, increased rates of fetal anomalies, higher rates of gestational diabetes, increased rate of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy including pre-eclampsia, increased spontaneous and iatrogenic preterm delivery rates, conversely also higher rates of large for gestational age infants at term and increased risk of maternal and fetal birth trauma, increased rates of thromboembolic events. Although preconception weight loss is often recommended as the first step for women with obesity and infertility, there is no clear best method and the role of the treating infertility provider in managing the weight loss is often secondary, if at all. The risk benefit ratio of preconception weight loss is uncertain. Rebound weight gain often follows weight loss, especially after conception with recommended weight gain during pregnancy even among women with obesity. Even less is known about the effects of obesity and preconception weight loss in males. (C) 2022 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据