4.6 Article

Silicone oil residual after vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment

期刊

EYE
卷 37, 期 9, 页码 1829-1833

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41433-022-02210-3

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the presence of residual emulsified silicone oil droplets in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) and explored their possible risk factors. The results showed that residual silicone oil particles were found in all patients, and the presence of these particles was positively correlated with axial length and ocular hypertension. The findings provide guidance for the treatment of these patients.
Objective To explore the presence of residual emulsified silicone oil (SO) droplets in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) and their possible risk factors. Methods Patients who underwent primary pars plana vitrectomy with SO injection for RRD and SO removal at the same eye centre were included. Approximately 10 weeks after SO removal, B-scan ultrasonography was performed, and using ImageJ, the silicone oil index (SOI) was measured, and its possible correlations with other clinical factors were explored. Results A total of 101 eyes were included. Residual SO particles were found in all the patients (100%), and the mean SOI was 4.04% +/- 5.16% (range 0.06%-19.88%). Multiple linear regression revealed that, among all the clinical factors, axial length (AL) and ocular hypertension (intraocular pressure (IOP) > 21 mmHg or the use of antiglaucoma medications) before SO removal were positively and significantly associated with the SOI (all P < 0.05). Patients with ocular hypertension after SO removal had a higher SOI, a longer SO duration, a higher IOP before SO removal and a longer AL than those without (all P < 0.05). Conclusions Patients with a larger AL and higher IOP before SO removal were more prone to have more residual SO droplets, which might in turn lead to an elevated IOP. In these eyes, thorough irrigation or repeated fluid-air exchange might be necessary.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据