4.7 Article

A meta-evolutionary selection of constituents in ensemble differential evolution algorithm

期刊

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
卷 205, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117667

关键词

Automated algorithm design; Grammatical evolution; Ensemble differential evolution; Parameter tuning; Meta evolutionary approach

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes an automated framework called MeSCEDE for designing high-level multi-population ensemble Differential Evolution algorithms. By using Grammatical Evolution as the meta-evolutionary algorithm, MeSCEDE is able to evolve effective ensemble designs and demonstrates competitive performance on benchmark functions and real-world problems.
A Meta-evolutionary Selection of Constituents in Ensemble DE (MeSCEDE) framework is proposed in this paper to automate the design of high-level multi-population ensemble Differential Evolution (DE) algorithms. The automated design of high-level multi-population ensemble DE algorithms involves both automated selection of constituent DE algorithms for the ensemble and automated configuration of ensemble related parameters. Grammatical Evolution has been used as the meta-evolutionary algorithm in MeSCEDE to search the space of design choices so as to evolve effective ensemble design(s) for given problem(s). The simulation experiments carried out in this paper involve applying MeSCEDE to evolve ensemble DE designs for solving 30-dimensional CEC'17 benchmark functions. The effectiveness of the evolved designs are validated on 30 and 50-dimensional CEC'14 functions as well as on 22 real-world problem instances from CEC'11 benchmark suite. The MeSCEDE evolved designs have exhibited a competitive performance against state-of-the-art ensemble DE algorithms. In addition, the potential of MeSCEDE has been demonstrated against irace, a state-of-the-art algorithm configurator. All simulation experiments reiterate the potential of MeSCEDE towards evolving effective and robust ensemble DE designs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据