4.7 Article

Gravitational wave signal recognition and ring-down time estimation via Artificial Neural Networks

期刊

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
卷 207, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117931

关键词

Gravitationalwaves; Patternrecognition; ArtificialNeuralNetwork; Timeseriesanalysis

资金

  1. Science and Technology Support Foundation of Pernambuco (FACEPE) Brazil
  2. Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)
  3. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior -Brasil (CAPES) [001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents a computational procedure based on Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) to recognize gravitational wave signals from LIGO data, allowing estimation of the damping time of the astronomical system through analysis of the score time series.
Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) was the first laboratory to measure the grav-itational waves successfully. An exceptional experimental design was needed to measure distance changes less than an atomic nucleus. In the same way, the data analyses to confirm and extract information is a tremendously challenging task. This article shows a computational procedure based on Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) to recognize a black hole-black hole gravitation wave event signal from the LIGO data. With the ANN introduced methodology, it is possible to define a numerical score, like a thermometer. High score values are associated with gravitational wave observation and small values with noise. Building a time series from these scores values, physical information about the astronomical system's damping time, the ring-down time, can be estimated at a first approximation, based on a damped harmonic oscillator modeling. Here, the ring-down time is estimated, at a first approximation, with a direct data measure on the ANN score time series, without using numerical relativity techniques and high computational power.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据