4.7 Article

Regression random machines: An ensemble support vector regression modelwith free kernel choice

期刊

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
卷 202, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2022.117107

关键词

Support vector regression; Bagging; Kernel functions

资金

  1. Brazilian research funding agency CAPES (Federal Agency for the Support and Improvement of Higher Education)
  2. Science Foundation Ireland Career Development Award [17/CDA/4695]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a new ensemble method called regression random machines for support vector regression. By using a random mixture of kernel functions and a properly bagging ensemble, this method eliminates the need to choose the best kernel function during the tuning process and achieves good predictive performance.
Machine learning techniques have one of their main objectives to reduce the generalized prediction error.Support vector models have as a main challenge the choice of an appropriate kernel function, as well asthe estimation of its hyperparameters. Such procedures are usually performed through some tests and tuningprocesses which require a high computational performance. In contrast, ensemble methods present a goodapproach to combine several models which result in a greater predictive capacity. In this paper, we propose anew ensemble method to support vector regression, namely regression random machines. The proposed methodeliminates the need to choose the best kernel function during the tuning process using a random mixture ofkernel functions combined with a properly bagging ensemble which considers the strength and agreement ofthe single models. The results demonstrated a good predictive performance through lower generalization errorwhich overlaps the single and bagged versions of support vector models with different kernels. The usefulnessof the proposed method is illustrated by simulation studies that were realized over eight artificial scenariosand twenty-seven real-world applications

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据