4.5 Article

Noninvasive prenatal screening in southeast China: clinical application and accuracy evaluation

期刊

EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS
卷 22, 期 8, 页码 841-848

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS AS
DOI: 10.1080/14737159.2022.2125803

关键词

Noninvasive prenatal screening; Z-score; common trisomy; sex chromosome aneuploidy; positive predictive value

资金

  1. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LBY21H040001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study evaluated the clinical performance of NIPS for common trisomy and sex chromosome aneuploidy, showing high accuracy in detecting common trisomy and SCA. However, caution is needed in subsequent genetic counseling regarding the risk identified by Z-scores.
Objective To assess the clinical performance of noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) for both common trisomy and sex chromosome aneuploidy (SCA). Methods We recruited 71,888 pregnant women to undergo NIPS testing from December 2015 to June 2021. Demographic characteristics, diagnostic results, and follow-up outcomes were collected. Results There were a total of 381 high-risk cases for common trisomy and 343 positive screens for SCA. Invasive prenatal diagnosis (IPD) was performed in 507 (70.0%) participants. The positive predictive value (PPV) was 83.7% for T21, 72.5% for T18, 14.3% for T13, 31.9% for 45,X, 72.0% for 47,XXX, 89.8% for 47,XXY, and 72.2% for 47,XYY, respectively. Logistic regression analysis presented a significant association between Z-score and PPV in common trisomy (P < 0.05) while not in SCA (P > 0.05). PPV in the high-risk group (Z-score >= cutoff) was superior to that in the intermediate risk group (3 <= Z-score < cutoff) for T21/T18/T13. PPV for 45,X, 47,XXY, and 47,XYY tended to be higher with the increasing Z-score, except for 47,XXX. Conclusions NIPS would be a valuable strategy in prenatal screening, while cautions should be kept in mind for subsequent genetic consulting about the risk of Z-score.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据