4.7 Article

The neural stem cell secretome across neurodevelopment

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY
卷 355, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2022.114142

关键词

Neural stem cell; Secretome; Neurodevelopment; Radial glia; Neural progenitor cell

资金

  1. NSF [IOS-1923094]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review focuses on investigating the autocrine and paracrine functions of the endogenous NSC secretome across life. Evidence shows that the NSC secretome is critical for how endogenous NSCs regulate themselves and their niche, but there are gaps in current literature, particularly in the clinically-relevant domain of endogenous NSC paracrine function in the injured CNS.
Neural stem cell (NSC) based therapies are at the forefront of regenerative medicine strategies to combat illness and injury of the central nervous system (CNS). In addition to their ability to produce new cells, NSCs secrete a variety of products, known collectively as the NSC secretome, that have been shown to ameliorate CNS disease pathology and promote recovery. As pre-clinical and clinical research to harness the NSC secretome for therapeutic purposes advances, a more thorough understanding of the endogenous NSC secretome can provide useful insight into the functional capabilities of NSCs. In this review, we focus on research investigating the autocrine and paracrine functions of the endogenous NSC secretome across life. Throughout development and adulthood, we find evidence that the NSC secretome is a critical component of how endogenous NSCs regulate themselves and their niche. We also find gaps in current literature, most notably in the clinically-relevant domain of endogenous NSC paracrine function in the injured CNS. Future investigations to further define the endogenous NSC secretome and its role in CNS tissue regulation are necessary to bolster our understanding of NSC-niche interactions and to aid in the generation of safe and effective NSC-based therapies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据