4.2 Article

Classical novae with CUBES

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL ASTRONOMY
卷 55, 期 1, 页码 191-198

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10686-022-09876-3

关键词

Nuclear reactions; Nucleosynthesis; Abundances - stars: novae

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CUBES is a new high-resolution spectrograph designed for the Very Large Telescope at the European Southern Observatory. It is primarily aimed at studying and characterizing the nucleosynthesis of beryllium. By directly identifying lithium in classical novae and observing the resonance transition of Be-7 II, CUBES can quantify the amount of Be-7 and Li-7 produced by different types of novae in the Milky Way and its nearby satellite galaxies. Additionally, it can provide insights into the properties of nova ejecta, the evolution of shocks in novae, and their connection to high-energy emission observed in these transients.
Among the main science cases that have motivated the proposal of CUBES, a new high-resolution spectrograph for the Very Large Telescope at the European Southern Observatory, there is the study and the characterisation of the nucleosynthesis of beryllium. Classical novae have been proposed since the '70s as one of the main factories of lithium in the Galaxy, but this hypothesis has been demonstrated on empirical basis only recently thanks to the direct identification of lithium in V1369 Cen and through the observations of the resonance transition of Be-7 II, the Li-7 parent, at 313.0 nm in the near-UV range. CUBES is then the ideal instrument to quantify the amount of Be-7 and therefore of Li-7 produced by the different novae types hosted in the different components of the Milky Way and also in its nearby satellite galaxies. As important by-product of high resolution spectroscopic observations obtained with CUBES, there are the study of the properties of nova ejecta abundances, the shocks evolution in novae and their connection with the high-energy emission observed in these transients, from satellites as Fermi and Swift.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据