4.7 Article

Advancing health care via artificial intelligence: From concept to clinic

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
卷 934, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2022.175320

关键词

Artificial intelligence (AI); Machine learning; Deep learning; Drug discovery; Health care; Research and development

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The application of artificial intelligence plays a crucial role in pharmaceutical research and clinical practice, accelerating the discovery and development of new drugs and providing better treatment options. Additionally, AI can be utilized in various areas such as diagnosis, drug delivery, and patient monitoring, contributing to improved healthcare outcomes and safety.
Ever Since, pharmaceutical companies are facing challenges to develop new drug products faster and economical with good quality, safety and efficacy. The advent of Artificial intelligence (AI) with computational technology empowers scientists, impacts society at a great scale by developing new drugs at rapid pace. Artificial intelligence is the science and engineering of creating intelligent machines using personified knowledge. There are many opportunities to apply AI tools to the drug discovery pipeline. Examples include target identification, identification of biomarkers, molecular modelling, synthesis of molecules, predicting toxicity and picking up leads. Further, this technology also helps the clinical scientists in clinical trial design, execution and real-time analysis. Altogether it facilitates the process of drug discovery, development and also provides better therapy to the patients. Apart from drug discovery and development, AI also has applications in the area of diagnosis, drug delivery, patient adherence and better monitoring of safety. There are many instances where AI can perform tasks better than humans and aid healthcare providers in treating patients. In this article, we have provided discussion on how AI is advancing the health care field to achieve greater success.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据