4.1 Review

Endoscopic and external dacryocystorhinostomy: A therapeutic proposal for distal acquired lacrimal obstructions

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 33, 期 3, 页码 1287-1293

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/11206721221132746

关键词

Lacrimal disease obstructions; lacrimal disease obstructions; lower system disease; lacrimal disease obstructions; upper system disease; lacrimal disease obstructions; diagnostic tests; lacrimal disease obstructions; lacrimal system trauma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article reviews the literature of the past 30 years on the use of END-DCR and EXT-DCR in treating DALO, aiming to provide a simple and reproducible treatment algorithm. For primary surgeries, END-DCR is preferred in the presence of intranasal comorbidities, while EXT-DCR is chosen if local anesthesia is needed. In recurrent cases, END-DCR is considered the treatment of choice.
Endoscopic (END-DCR) and external dacryocystorhinostomies (EXT-DCR) are nowadays considered the gold standard techniques for non-oncologic distal acquired lacrimal disorders (DALO). However, no unanimous consensus has been achieved on which of these surgeries is the most suitable to the individual patient. Herein, we review the available literature of the last 30 years with the aim of defining a simple and reproduceable treatment algorithm to treat DALO. A search of PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and Cochrane databases was last performed in December 2021 to examine evidence regarding the role of END-DCR and EXT-DCR in primary and revision surgeries. If considered primary surgeries, END-DCR should be preferred in case of intranasal comorbidities, given the possibility to directly visualize and treat potential intranasal pathologies. Conversely, EXT-DCR should be chosen in case of need/preference for local anesthesia, given the major historical experience and wider surgical field that helps to resolve intra-operatory complications (e.g., bleeding) in an uncollaborative patient. In the absence of the abovementioned conditions, the decision of one or other approach should be discussed with the patient. In recurrent cases, END-DCR should be considered the treatment of choice given the major likelihood to visualize the causes of primary failure and directly resolve it. In conclusion, END-DCR should be considered the treatment of choice in revision cases or in primary ones associated with intranasal pathologies, whereas EXT-DCR should be chosen if local anesthesia is needed. In the absence of these scenarios, it is still open to debate which of these two approaches should be used.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据