4.7 Review

A review of synchronization problems in parts-to-picker warehouses

期刊

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
卷 307, 期 3, 页码 1374-1390

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2022.09.035

关键词

Scheduling; Warehousing; Parts-to-picker; Synchronization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper explores the synchronization problems that arise in warehouses that have evolved into fully-automated fulfillment factories due to the success of e-commerce. By optimizing workstation setups and implementing synchronization operations, the picking efficiency can be improved and the burden on the bin supply system can be reduced. The findings demonstrate that the right workstation setup significantly enhances throughput performance.
Triggered by the great success of e-commerce, today's warehouses more and more evolve to fully-automated fulfillment factories. Many of them follow the parts-to-picker paradigm and employ shelf-lifting mobile robots or conveyors to deliver stock keeping units (SKUs) to stationary pickers operating in picking workstations. This paper aims to structure and review the family of synchronization problems that arise in this environment: If multiple orders demanding the same SKU can be serviced jointly, then a more efficient picking process and a relief of the bin supply system can be achieved. This paper clas-sifies the family of slightly varying synchronization problems arising with different workstation setups in alternative warehouses. This classification scheme is applied to analyze computational complexity, to systematically quantify the gains of alternative workstation setups, and to benchmark the performance gains of synchronization with those of other well-established decision tasks. Our results show that the right workstation setup can greatly improve throughput performance, so that the gains of synchronization can outreach those promised by other well-researched decision tasks.(c) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据