4.4 Article

Use parent concrete strength and equivalent water absorption of recycled concrete aggregates to identify concrete properties

期刊

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/19648189.2022.2134217

关键词

Recycled aggregate; equivalent water absorption; compressive strength; parent concrete; workability; shrinkage

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article focuses on studying the properties of recycled aggregate concretes (RAC) based on the equivalent water absorption of aggregates and the parent concrete strength of reclaimed concrete aggregates (RCA). New relationships were deduced from the results, showing that a 1% increase in equivalent water absorption led to a 0.12% increase in superplasticizer dosages. It was found that the hyperbolic model is more suitable for estimating the compressive strength and shrinkage of RAC when considering the parent concrete strength and equivalent water absorption. The study also highlights the importance of having a parent concrete strength for RCA that is at least 10 MPa higher than the reference concrete to prevent a drop in compressive strength. For higher equivalent water absorption, the ultimate shrinkage increased and slowed down.
This article focuses to study some properties of recycled aggregate concretes (RAC) according to the equivalent water absorption of aggregates and the parent concrete strength of RCA and thus new relationships were deduced. The results indicated that 1% increase of the equivalent water absorption induced 0.12% increase in superplasticiser dosages. The hyperbolic model seems to be more adequate to estimate compressive strength and shrinkage of RAC when the parent concrete strength and the equivalent water absorption were introduced. According to the obtained results, the parent concrete strength of RCA must not be less than 10 MPa than that of the reference concrete to avoid the drop in compressive strength. For high equivalent water absorption, the ultimate shrinkage became higher and slower.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据